[Removed]
[Removed]
[Removed]
Why are you making a thread for every node you have a question and then going back and removing your replies?
1 Like
[Removed]
[Removed]
[Removed]
Why don’t you test yourself those nodes in some example game ?
This is what i do when i need something
http://forums.armory3d.org/t/arrays-logic-nodes-examples/1981/2
I prefer small example demonstration, like the ones Armory has instead of pages of documentation.
1 Like
[Removed]
[Removed]
[Removed]
Again why don’t you make some effort to test it yourself ?
Open some game example and add that logic and you’ll figure out what it does 
Most logic nodes doesn’t need documentation, they are very common functionality to game development.
What i think is you’ll better invest your time making some game jam or examples showcase in Armory instead of making nodes documentation.
1 Like
A game example is the “Flappy Cube” game I created for this some time ago. It is a basic “Flappy Bird” Rip-off.
Also the ACXT3R project has some sizeable node trees to learn from.
1 Like
[Removed]
[Removed]
[Removed]
It is so much work to open any game template and add those nodes ?
It took me some minutes to add and test.
Why are you asking other people to do the work for you ? 
And we are not elitist, some are already experienced with game development, so lot of things are very familiar in Amory 3D.
Again i believe beginners learn more and faster following game tutorials covering many aspects instead of documentation reading.
1 Like
Armory need to fix many issues with physics, decals, emissive materials, better lighting or occlusion, and many others.
I really don’t think nodes documentation is a priority, while you could work on your game instead.
Great Timing!!!
Not sure I get this. 
its a reply to the second message.